Small GUI annoyance #485

Forums

Hi @windowsrefund
I've seen this incident of yours on github, and I know what happened.

You opened the folder and/or file manager in Qtractor. This shifted the left margin.
You corrected it, you put the margin where you wanted.

When you closed the folders and/or files, it logically shifted back.

When you corrected it again, it was back in its correct position.

There was never really an incident :).
Unless we want opening the folders and/or files to not shift the margin.
I always thought that would be the desirable behavior, but I don't know if it's possible to fix it, and above all it's a minor annoyance.

Permalink

Hi,

I assume you're talking about View/Windows/Files? There are times I use that panel in order to run the "cleanup" function after a Mixdown. I don't recall ever using that workflow on this particular session but I trust you know what you're talking about and/or your theory applies in some other form.

Again, no big deal either way. That said, I'll certainly keep your theory in mind going forward in order to see if I can identify a repeatable scenario where this behavior is seen.

Happy Thanksgiving.

Permalink

Yea, G3N-es... I see what you mean now. The margin is moved to the left and visible columns can be reduced.

If we were to close the Files panel/dialog now, everything would return to the preview layout. However, if we adjust the margin in order to inspect or tweak a plugin, the margin appears to get "set" and the previous layout will not be restored when the Files dialog is closed.

Worth pointing out I believe is that the "Files dialog" is just an example. This "horizontal squashing" trait of the Arranger window can be invoked in many scenarios; especially in the case where a tiling window manager is used.

So basically, I find myself asking what benefit the "squash" (I'm just going to keep calling it this...lol) offers? I can't think of any so I tend to want to suggest it just be eliminated? Curious to hear any thoughts.

Permalink

just to let you stop the discussion, if any, this squashing is sure just a Qt micro-management thing (on dockable widgets)...

so let it be: it is not worth to hack on this--I'm not keen and sure won't do anything about it, so please don't overcomplicate it :)

cheers

Permalink

It would be better without squashing.
But as it is, is it bad? No. It's fine as it is.

I think we can all agree that it's a minor thing and not worth changing.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Markdown

  • Parses markdown and converts it to HTML.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type='1 A I'> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id='jump-*'> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id> <img src alt height width> <strike> <pre> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Filtered HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <b> <i> <pre> <img src alt height width> <strike>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
File attachments
Unlimited number of files can be uploaded to this field.
2 MB limit.
Allowed types: jpg jpeg gif png txt doc docx xls xlsx pdf ppt pps odt ods odp zip gz bz2 xz patch diff wav ogg flac ogv mp4 qtz.
CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.