Small GUI annoyance #485

Forums

Hi @windowsrefund
I've seen this incident of yours on github, and I know what happened.

You opened the folder and/or file manager in Qtractor. This shifted the left margin.
You corrected it, you put the margin where you wanted.

When you closed the folders and/or files, it logically shifted back.

When you corrected it again, it was back in its correct position.

There was never really an incident :).
Unless we want opening the folders and/or files to not shift the margin.
I always thought that would be the desirable behavior, but I don't know if it's possible to fix it, and above all it's a minor annoyance.

Permalink

Hi,
I assume you're talking about View/Windows/Files? There are times I use that panel in order to run the "cleanup" function after a Mixdown. I don't recall ever using that workflow on this particular session but I trust you know what you're talking about and/or your theory applies in some other form.
Again, no big deal either way. That said, I'll certainly keep your theory in mind going forward in order to see if I can identify a repeatable scenario where this behavior is seen.
Happy Thanksgiving.

Permalink

Yea, G3N-es... I see what you mean now. The margin is moved to the left and visible columns can be reduced.
If we were to close the Files panel/dialog now, everything would return to the preview layout. However, if we adjust the margin in order to inspect or tweak a plugin, the margin appears to get "set" and the previous layout will not be restored when the Files dialog is closed.
Worth pointing out I believe is that the "Files dialog" is just an example. This "horizontal squashing" trait of the Arranger window can be invoked in many scenarios; especially in the case where a tiling window manager is used.
So basically, I find myself asking what benefit the "squash" (I'm just going to keep calling it this...lol) offers? I can't think of any so I tend to want to suggest it just be eliminated? Curious to hear any thoughts.

Permalink

just to let you stop the discussion, if any, this squashing is sure just a Qt micro-management thing (on dockable widgets)...
so let it be: it is not worth to hack on this--I'm not keen and sure won't do anything about it, so please don't overcomplicate it :)
cheers

Permalink

It would be better without squashing.
But as it is, is it bad? No. It's fine as it is.

I think we can all agree that it's a minor thing and not worth changing.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Markdown

  • Parses markdown and converts it to HTML.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type='1 A I'> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id='jump-*'> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id> <img src alt height width> <strike>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Filtered HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <b> <i> <pre> <img src alt height width> <strike>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
File attachments
Unlimited number of files can be uploaded to this field.
2 MB limit.
Allowed types: jpg jpeg gif png txt doc docx xls xlsx pdf ppt pps odt ods odp zip gz bz2 xz patch diff wav ogg flac ogv mp4 qtz.