Although I was not on the wrong path with the SFZ, it is now clearer to me.
Thank you :).
I have been reviewing SFZ and I have verified that it does have support for presets. An XML that points to different SFZ, therefore it should be possible to make libraries.
This being the case, there really should be no preference for SF2, (since SFZ allows the instruments to be better defined). However I say it, SF2 is more portable to me. Although I think it is something more subjective than real.
As for the buses.
As I indicated above to DavidJS, I do not agree with the advantages of working in BUS. My machine is more than 10 years old and it is true that more resources are consumed, but we are talking about a more than acceptable percentage for what you get in return. Being able to work eq and other effects separately.
Although I was not on the wrong path with the SFZ, it is now clearer to me.
Thank you :).
I have been reviewing SFZ and I have verified that it does have support for presets. An XML that points to different SFZ, therefore it should be possible to make libraries.
This being the case, there really should be no preference for SF2, (since SFZ allows the instruments to be better defined). However I say it, SF2 is more portable to me. Although I think it is something more subjective than real.
As for the buses.
As I indicated above to DavidJS, I do not agree with the advantages of working in BUS. My machine is more than 10 years old and it is true that more resources are consumed, but we are talking about a more than acceptable percentage for what you get in return. Being able to work eq and other effects separately.
greetings