you might have a point, and I would really appreciate your advice on this whole mess :)
so what do you suggest? what do you think is the correct approach?
currently the percentage is applied to the filler gap; I do now reckon it's not the best, you tell me.
let's think about this for a moment: you agree that, for the 100% setting, all works as originally intended, right?
however, with this variable percentage and quantization crap we're just simply making it a little more flexible, and like, as you say, more articulated...
hi David,
you might have a point, and I would really appreciate your advice on this whole mess :)
so what do you suggest? what do you think is the correct approach?
currently the percentage is applied to the filler gap; I do now reckon it's not the best, you tell me.
let's think about this for a moment: you agree that, for the 100% setting, all works as originally intended, right?
however, with this variable percentage and quantization crap we're just simply making it a little more flexible, and like, as you say, more articulated...
should we drop it altogether?
eager to know your stance
cheers