yes, i understand that the percentage option is not that musically consistent;
meanwhile in 0.9.36.12+, the percent value may be greater than 100% which might be exactly what you ask as for a "negative" gap; tough it remains inconsistent as you say.
so I thought of yet an additional parameter: what about a post-quantization like a snap-to-beat that is applied after each affected note duration ? it should apply iif the percentage value is not 100%.
this new parameter should present the usual drop-down list of snap-to-beat items: "None", "Beat", "Beat/2", etc.; when "None" is there selected (the default) then all works as is, with no gap quantization applied.
hi @DavidJS
yes, i understand that the percentage option is not that musically consistent;
meanwhile in 0.9.36.12+, the percent value may be greater than 100% which might be exactly what you ask as for a "negative" gap; tough it remains inconsistent as you say.
so I thought of yet an additional parameter: what about a post-quantization like a snap-to-beat that is applied after each affected note duration ? it should apply iif the percentage value is not 100%.
this new parameter should present the usual drop-down list of snap-to-beat items: "None", "Beat", "Beat/2", etc.; when "None" is there selected (the default) then all works as is, with no gap quantization applied.
what do you think? does it make any sense?
thanks