You are here

Add new comment

rncbc's picture

hi David,

you might have a point, and I would really appreciate your advice on this whole mess :)

so what do you suggest? what do you think is the correct approach?
currently the percentage is applied to the filler gap; I do now reckon it's not the best, you tell me.

let's think about this for a moment: you agree that, for the 100% setting, all works as originally intended, right?

however, with this variable percentage and quantization crap we're just simply making it a little more flexible, and like, as you say, more articulated...

should we drop it altogether?

eager to know your stance
cheers