Add new comment

that's an interesting finding.

most probably due to rounding and to extreme low tempo (30bpm) and incredible low time-signature divisor (/32).

you probably know that you'll get virtually the same "metronomic" result, but with better display accuracy for that matter, if you, say, set tempo=240 bpm and beat divisor to the regular standard quarter-node (/4), don't you?

all that to say it's more kind of a "nit-picking" decimal representation and numerical precision problem than a real bug one ;)

hth.
cheers